Abstract
Radioactive isotopes originating 
from the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan following the 
earthquake and tsunami
                              in March 2011 were found in resident 
marine animals and in migratory Pacific bluefin tuna (PBFT). Publication
 of this information
                              resulted in a worldwide response that 
caused public anxiety and concern, although PBFT captured off California
 in August 2011
                              contained activity concentrations below 
those from naturally occurring radionuclides. To link the radioactivity 
to possible
                              health impairments, we calculated doses, 
attributable to the Fukushima-derived and the naturally occurring 
radionuclides,
                              to both the marine biota and human fish 
consumers. We showed that doses in all cases were dominated by the 
naturally occurring
                              alpha-emitter 210Po and that Fukushima-derived doses were three to four orders of magnitude below 210Po-derived doses. Doses to marine biota were about two orders of magnitude below the lowest benchmark protection level proposed
                              for ecosystems (10 µGy⋅h−1). 
The additional dose from Fukushima radionuclides to humans consuming 
tainted PBFT in the United States was calculated to
                              be 0.9 and 4.7 µSv for average consumers 
and subsistence fishermen, respectively. Such doses are comparable to, 
or less than,
                              the dose all humans routinely obtain from 
naturally occurring radionuclides in many food items, medical 
treatments, air travel,
                              or other background sources. Although 
uncertainties remain regarding the assessment of cancer risk at low 
doses of ionizing
                              radiation to humans, the dose received 
from PBFT consumption by subsistence fishermen can be estimated to 
result in two additional
                              fatal cancer cases per 10,000,000 
similarly exposed people.
                           
Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/30/1221834110
No comments:
Post a Comment